<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Tertiary Matters</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tertiarymatters.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tertiarymatters.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>(news about the QNX ecosystem)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 13:54:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Power Architecture and the Industrial Market by Paul Leroux</title>
		<link>http://tertiarymatters.wordpress.com/2009/04/30/power-architecture-and-the-industrial-market/#comment-38</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Leroux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 13:54:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tertiarymatters.wordpress.com/?p=366#comment-38</guid>
		<description>Interesting point, Romain. Because PowerQUICC parts are labeled as &quot;communications&quot; processors, I&#039;ve always assumed that they were designed specifically for netcom systems. But a brief perusal of the Freescale site confirms my error: Freescale does indeed target IA systems with some of their PowerQUICC models. 

- Paul</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting point, Romain. Because PowerQUICC parts are labeled as &#8220;communications&#8221; processors, I&#8217;ve always assumed that they were designed specifically for netcom systems. But a brief perusal of the Freescale site confirms my error: Freescale does indeed target IA systems with some of their PowerQUICC models. </p>
<p>- Paul</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on QNX CAR – the start of something big by Romain</title>
		<link>http://tertiarymatters.wordpress.com/2009/03/02/qnx-car-%e2%80%93-the-start-of-something-big/#comment-32</link>
		<dc:creator>Romain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 18:41:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tertiarymatters.wordpress.com/?p=291#comment-32</guid>
		<description>It is aimed at automotive OEMs and Tier ones initially. We are getting interest from some other market segments as well. QNX CAR includes a number of QNX technologies and third party technologies that could apply to consumer, industrial automation and even medical markets so while the initial target is focused the potential is quite large.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is aimed at automotive OEMs and Tier ones initially. We are getting interest from some other market segments as well. QNX CAR includes a number of QNX technologies and third party technologies that could apply to consumer, industrial automation and even medical markets so while the initial target is focused the potential is quite large.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on QNX CAR – the start of something big by Mario</title>
		<link>http://tertiarymatters.wordpress.com/2009/03/02/qnx-car-%e2%80%93-the-start-of-something-big/#comment-31</link>
		<dc:creator>Mario</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 18:14:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tertiarymatters.wordpress.com/?p=291#comment-31</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m curious.  What target is the QNX CAR stuff aim at. It seems to mean there is only a short list of potential customers for this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m curious.  What target is the QNX CAR stuff aim at. It seems to mean there is only a short list of potential customers for this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on QNX CAR – the start of something big by Aleks</title>
		<link>http://tertiarymatters.wordpress.com/2009/03/02/qnx-car-%e2%80%93-the-start-of-something-big/#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator>Aleks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 11:42:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tertiarymatters.wordpress.com/?p=291#comment-22</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the link ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the link &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Intel, BMW and QNX? by tertiarymatters</title>
		<link>http://tertiarymatters.wordpress.com/2009/02/17/intel-bmw-and-qnx/#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>tertiarymatters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 17:21:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tertiarymatters.wordpress.com/?p=240#comment-19</guid>
		<description>Fair enough. You&#039;re right, I don&#039;t actually know if BMW has any involvement in this at all. I also can&#039;t speak to what HMI&#039;s the car demos. Thanks for the input.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fair enough. You&#8217;re right, I don&#8217;t actually know if BMW has any involvement in this at all. I also can&#8217;t speak to what HMI&#8217;s the car demos. Thanks for the input.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Intel, BMW and QNX? by Ash</title>
		<link>http://tertiarymatters.wordpress.com/2009/02/17/intel-bmw-and-qnx/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>Ash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 16:50:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tertiarymatters.wordpress.com/?p=240#comment-18</guid>
		<description>Although its a BMW I think its not down to BMW I think.  Its just a vehicle HB have used.
 
The vehicle demos HMI&#039;s from; Audi MMI, Porsche, Mercedes and BMW.  Hence, do you see a BMW Logo, apart from the on the front of all BMWs</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although its a BMW I think its not down to BMW I think.  Its just a vehicle HB have used.</p>
<p>The vehicle demos HMI&#8217;s from; Audi MMI, Porsche, Mercedes and BMW.  Hence, do you see a BMW Logo, apart from the on the front of all BMWs</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Black Ice, CES and the Future of Infotainment by romainsaha</title>
		<link>http://tertiarymatters.wordpress.com/2009/01/20/black-ice-ces-and-the-future-of-infotainment/#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>romainsaha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 14:47:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tertiarymatters.wordpress.com/?p=202#comment-17</guid>
		<description>Hmm... In my specific case the difference was the point at which I get on the highway (one entrance ramp later) so even if the traffic had been heavier it still would have been faster. In general, though, I take your point but perhaps the load balancing effect, spreading the traffic across multiple routes would help things overall.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm&#8230; In my specific case the difference was the point at which I get on the highway (one entrance ramp later) so even if the traffic had been heavier it still would have been faster. In general, though, I take your point but perhaps the load balancing effect, spreading the traffic across multiple routes would help things overall.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Black Ice, CES and the Future of Infotainment by Mario</title>
		<link>http://tertiarymatters.wordpress.com/2009/01/20/black-ice-ces-and-the-future-of-infotainment/#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>Mario</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 21:14:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tertiarymatters.wordpress.com/?p=202#comment-16</guid>
		<description>If everybody had that traffic information, it would still have taken you 30 minutes because of the bottleneck created by the extra trafic</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If everybody had that traffic information, it would still have taken you 30 minutes because of the bottleneck created by the extra trafic</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Innovation Award &#8211; QNX Fastboot on Intel® Atom™ by Gustaf</title>
		<link>http://tertiarymatters.wordpress.com/2008/12/02/innovation-award-qnx-fastboot-on-intel%c2%ae-atom%e2%84%a2/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>Gustaf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 04:38:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tertiarymatters.wordpress.com/?p=53#comment-13</guid>
		<description>I want an Eee PC with QNX fastboot as my next computer.
If it gets the WiFi and the browser up and running in less then 5sec I think we have a winner</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I want an Eee PC with QNX fastboot as my next computer.<br />
If it gets the WiFi and the browser up and running in less then 5sec I think we have a winner</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The desktop in the car &#8211; Pandora Internet Radio by Romain</title>
		<link>http://tertiarymatters.wordpress.com/2008/12/08/the-desktop-in-the-car-pandora-internet-radio/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>Romain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 22:01:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tertiarymatters.wordpress.com/?p=29#comment-4</guid>
		<description>My tastes are eclectic to say the least and I have had good experience seeding with several different songs. I don&#039;t know when they plan to license it. It used to be available here in Canada and it just went away. There are some other similar internet radio offerings you could try.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My tastes are eclectic to say the least and I have had good experience seeding with several different songs. I don&#8217;t know when they plan to license it. It used to be available here in Canada and it just went away. There are some other similar internet radio offerings you could try.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
